Repost: Is Fighting Good For You? | Mark’s Daily Apple

wrestling

 

The Role of Fighting in a Primal Life

Welcome Stumblers and all newcomers! If you want to lose weight, gain muscle, increase energy levels, reduce stress or just generally look and feel healthier you’ve come to the right place.

Subscribe to my free weekly newsletter for tips, advice and special insider-only information.

Learn more about the Primal Lifestyle by visiting the Primal Blueprint 101 page. Thanks for visiting!

wrestlingIn today’s post I’d like to explore whether fighting is something missing from our lives. Before you protest, understand what I mean by “fighting.” I won’t be directly commenting on the war and violence we see on the evening news. Genocide, conquest, theft, rape, and murder? These are acts of coercive violence, wherein either an institution, an individual, or a group of individuals perpetrate violence (or coerce others to do the perpetrating for them) against people who have not consented. No, I’m talking about something decidedly different. Boxing, MMA, martial arts, wrestling, and just roughhousing with some buddies are all examples of two people consensually engaging in interpersonal violence. Going up against another person in single, consensual combat where personal enmity is not the motivating factor? I can’t imagine a greater test of one’s strength, speed, skill, and smarts. Let’s dig in.

 

Last time, I mentioned that violence was ubiquitous among early humans. Hominids have been fighting for millions of years, and every culture of humans has a fighting tradition, from the boxing, wrestling, and pankration (a freeform mix of boxing and wrestling, similar to MMA) of the ancient Hellenic world to the well-known East Asian martial arts (judo, jujitsu, karate, kung fu, tai chi, etc.) to the folk grappling/wrestling traditions that every culture across every continent seems to have. People fight, people like winning fights, and fighting systems improve a person’s ability to win fights, so even if our ancestors weren’t writing instructional manuals, they were probably learning to fight.

In the West, we hear the words “martial art” and imagine Mr. Miyagi, Shaolin monks, and Bruce Lee uttering “Be like water.” It’s come to be associated most strongly with Eastern religious philosophy, with “zen” (or whatever we think zen is) and calm, kindly old men who’d rather teach and talk than fight (but when they fight, you better watch out). And indeed, most traditional Eastern martial arts are linked to various schools of religious thought, but when you get down to it, a martial art remains a codified system of combat – a fighting system primarily developed to improve self-defense and physical conditioning. So why the spiritual stuff? Systematic fighting likely didn’t arise as a way to become enlightened or achieve perpetual serenity – people developed codified fighting because it helped them win fights and stay alive in battles – the philosophy came after as a natural product of learning how to fight.

What if fighting is a way to “tame the beast” within? By being aggressive for a short amount of time in a controlled environment where aggression is expected and understood, you satisfy the “need” for aggression. Remember that human aggression is probably an adaptive trait, a deep-seated holdover from the days when surviving and thriving meant killing things (and sometimes people) for food or territory. As I mentioned yesterday, aggressive people had a better shot at obtaining resources, retaining mates, and spreading their genes. Evidence for the effect of fight training on aggression is mixed. While a few studies suggest that martial arts training increases aggression, a recent review (PDF) of the literature found that the majority of studies show martial arts to have a favorable effect on aggression across all age groups. Of course, this all presupposes that “aggression” is always a negative trait that results in actual violence. If that aggression is used or redirected productively – when training or fighting – it may not even result in destructive or “extracurricular” violence.

In fact, I’ve yet to see any evidence that martial arts training increases violence outside of the ring/mat/gym. There’s some evidence that training in martial arts or other fighting systems reduces violence, however, and it appears to have a generally positive effect on mood. Three US elementary schools used a martial arts training program called the Gentle Warrior to reduce bullying in 3rd, 4th, and 5th graders. Participants who spent the most time in the program displayed the most empathy, fewer bouts of aggression, and a greater frequency of helpful by-standing, or helping out others who were being bullied; the effect was only present in males, however. Another recent British study found that youths who were involved in “combat sports” were subjected to fewer environmental risk factors commonly associated with criminality. It was questionnaire-based and totally observational, but it’s supportive of the hypothesis that martial arts does not increase violence. A similar study was undertaken to assess the impact of martial arts training on “high-risk” youth, finding that training improved self-esteem and gave high-risk kids a less favorable attitude toward violence in general.

Martial arts could even be rehabilitative. In female veterans suffering from post-traumatic stress disorder who had been sexually assaulted by fellow soldiers while serving, a self-defense program improved their mental states and reduced PTSD symptoms. The results were impressive. At six months, behavioral avoidance and depression had decreased.

For a sport that revolves around inflicting damage on your opponent, mixed martial arts has fairly low rates of serious injury. In a study of injury trends during 635 professional matches, lacerations (tearing of the skin from blunt trauma, like a fist or knee; ugly, but relatively minor) were the most common injury. Serious concussions occurred in 3% of matches, and no deaths or serious injuries occurred. A comparison (PDF) between martial arts, wrestling, and boxing found that boxing resulted in the most injuries, followed by wrestling, and then martial arts, but overall, the three combat sports had similar injury rates to non-combat sports. I’ve heard that since boxing gloves are bigger than MMA gloves, they allow the fighter to take more hits, so more damage accumulates, somewhat similar to the effects of padded running shoes. The pain is blunted but the damage is done.

Overall, I think there’s a strong case to be made that humans derive a lot of benefits from fighting in a structured system against peers, not out of anger, but with mutual respect. Indeed, it appears to reduce or redirect aggression, relieve stress, build self-confidence, and improve mood (and who couldn’t use a little less stress, a little more confidence, and a better mood?). In my opinion, structured combat training allows us to address the modern “violence deficit” without seriously hurting others, hurting ourselves, or getting into trouble with the law. Joining an MMA or boxing gym, learning to wrestle, or attending martial arts classes are probably ideal, as they provide the structure and guidance that a beginner needs, and they offer the chance to “fight” people who are there with a similar mindset and purpose. Another option is to roughhouse with a friend, but I’m not sure unstructured, untrained freeform fighting offers the same benefits as a structured fighting system, or if it’s even safe. If that’s your only option, exercise caution, don’t ruin any friendships, or consider a heavy bag instead.

The only MMA site I’m familiar with is Sherdog, and from initial observations it appears to have a robust forum with some helpful folks who do the sport themselves (rather than just talk about professionals who do). If you want to get started with fight training, that might be a good place to start. If you’re looking for gyms or schools for instruction, quick Google of “mma gym (your city)” or “boxing gym (your city)” or whatever fighting art interests you will produce results. Be sure to check reviews on Yelp. A lot of places will offer beginner classes for free to let you get a feel for the place. Look for gyms with supportive, friendly teachers and students without visible egos. Don’t go joining Cobra-Kai dojo or anything like that.

I know from your emails that I have a lot of readers who are into mixed martial arts and other combat disciplines, so please – blow up the comment section with advice on how one gets started with learning how to fight. I’d really appreciate it, and I’m sure all our readers would, too.

Apple Muffins by Everyday Paleo

img_7949-1

So I made these for the 3rd time today.  And for the 3rd time the hardest part of this entire recipe is not shoving a piping hot muffin into your mouth right after you pull them out of the muffin.

There may be a couple of tweets going out towards @everydaypaleo to see what bonuses we can add to these muffins!  I highly recommend making these ASAP!

Breaking News! Balanced Bites Podcast

BBpodcastLG-640x283

This is good news for all of us, so get excited!  As we all know I am in no way an expert just a practitioner.  When we get the real experts involved and out there we all benefit.  I for one know this sounds like a great idea, and to further the benefit a live call-in?  I am almost drooling with the anticipation of some random question!

Per Balanced Bites @ www.balancedbites.com

I’ve been searching high and low for the right co-host to tackle a podcast with me. Well, the day has come and now I have some VERY exciting news: The Balanced Bites Podcast is getting ready to launch!

Liz Wolfe

Let me introduce you to my fantastic co-host, Liz Wolfe.

Liz runs the popular blog, Cavegirleats.com and was first introduced to evolutionary nutrition through her training at CrossFit Kansas City working with Coach Rut. When she and her husband moved to New Jersey, she continued to study the scientific and practical applications of Paleo nutrition and nutritional therapy. In addition to her blog, she is also a regular contributor to the Steve’s Original blog. If you haven’t read any of Liz’s blog yet, well get on over there! She is smart, witty, knowledgeable and, best of all, has a very balanced approach to applying Paleo principles in our daily lives.
Find Liz around the interwebs: blog  |  facebook  |  twitter

About the Podcast.

Liz and I are lining up the questions that we’ll be answering from you, our readers, followers and fans. We’re also going to be offering up something that is totally new in the Paleo-podcast-sphere: a live call-in segment. YES! You will be able to call us, live, with your Paleo nutrition related questions! Keep your eyes here and on the Podcast page for more information and updates. Our first episode will probably not include call-ins, but once we’re up and running, it’ll be game-on!

Are you excited?! WE ARE!

Already have a burning question? Submit it here >

Cheers!
Diane & Liz

About the author

Diane Sanfilippo BS, Certified Nutrition Consultant, C.H.E.K. Holistic Lifestyle Coach is a San Francisco-based Nutritionist & Paleo Nutritionist serving the Bay Area and beyond (US & international) via phone, Skype consultations and nutrition seminars. Author of “The Practical Paleo Nutrition Guide Book.” An 80-Page eBook guide to making a Paleo diet easy! Filled with tips, tricks, meal planning tools and recipes. Creator of The 21-Day Sugar Detox “The 21-Day Sugar Detox.” Bust sugar and carb cravings in 21 days with the help and support of a community who is all in it together!

The Burgener Warm-Up, An Abosolute Necessity!

DSC00002

The Burgener Warm-Up has been a great resource, no matter what Oly Lift I am attempting. And in this video he even mentions that the Warm-Up should be a part of everyday warm-ups no matter the workout, and I am in absolute agreement. So to start I recommend watching or reading the Burgener Warm-Up (CrossFit Journal has the video) or go to Mike’s website for a description.

The Burgener Warm-Up

If you have just watched or already know of the Burgener Warm-Up, watch the below. Pay attention I think there are some amazing tips in here. The horizontal hip movement is pretty common but OI think the internal v. external rotation is going to fix problems in a lot of athletes, who had no idea why the were bailing!

Correcting Issues with The Burgener Warm-Up

Hope it helps, I’ll be trying it tomorrow to PR on the Snatch!

-projectRx out!

Warm-Ups Before Exercise – Many Methods, Little Research – NYTimes.com

18bestspan-articleLarge

 

Rodrigo Oscar de Mattos Eustachio

At the Boston Marathon last month, my running partner, Jen Davis, said things were pretty much the same as the 10 other times she has run this race. Most runners stood around waiting for the race to start. Some did strides — short bursts of speed — or ran briefly at close to their race pace. There was a lot of stretching, too, and applications of heat rubs like Bengay and jumping up and down to stay warm.

My son, Stefan Kolata, was with the elite men this year in Boston and warmed up with them in their own special pre-race area. Those runners had a very different routine, he says. They spent about 15 minutes doing sort of a slow shuffle. There they were, a long line of elites, going around and around the warm-up area, barely lifting their legs.

Then, some went to a parking lot and did dynamic stretching — high knees, backward running, sideways running. Others vanished from the outdoor warm-up area, emerging again when the race was about to begin.

When it was all over, the men’s winner finished in 2:05:52, an average pace of 4 minutes 48 seconds per mile. Even the 10th-place finisher had a time of 2:10:33, or 4:59 a mile. So maybe these fast men know a secret about warm-ups.

Or maybe not.

Just about every serious competitive athlete, it seems, warms up before a race or even a training session. But there seems to be no particular method to their warm-ups.

Some, like Paula Radcliffe, the world record holder for the women’s marathon, spend more time warming up than most people spend running.

“Warm-up usually takes 45 to 50 minutes and is pretty much the same for workouts and races,” she told me. It consists of jogging for 10 to 20 minutes, stretching, and then doing strides.

But her warm-up is short and easy compared with the cyclist Andy Hampsten’s 90-minute warm-up before a time trial, in which cyclists ride one by one as fast as they can over a course that is typically about 25 miles.

Mr. Hampsten, who rode in the Tour de France and was the only American ever to win the Tour of Italy, began his warm-up with 30 minutes of easy riding followed by 40 minutes in which he rode as hard as he could for intervals of 2 minutes, alternating with 5 minutes at an easy pace, followed by 20 more minutes of easy riding. He said he knew he was warmed up when he got “a mild endorphin buzz.”

At the other extreme is the Olympic swimmer Dara Torres.

“I don’t need a ton of warm-up to be ready for my races,” she said. Her warm-up is just “some light swimming, kicking and drills,” followed by a few sprints.

Exercise researchers say they are not surprised by the lack of consensus on warming up. There is a theory of why it should improve performance, but there is dearth of good research on whether it actually does.

The theory, said Paul Laursen, a performance physiologist at the Millennium Institute of Sport and Health, in Auckland, New Zealand, is that muscles contract better after they have already been contracting.

As a muscle warms up, the force of its contractions can be charted like a staircase: when it starts to work, the contractions may be only half as strong as they are after it has contracted a few times. The explanation is that the contractions release calcium ions in the cells, enabling the muscle fibers to contract more forcefully. At the same time, muscle enzymes, which work best when slightly higher than body temperature, heat up and become more efficient.

That may be why the elite male marathoners did well after their slow shuffles. “Despite the fact that they can go so fast,” Dr. Laursen said, it will take only a few muscle contractions for their muscles to warm up effectively for their long duration event.”

But the story may be different for shorter events. Dr. Laursen said that athletes might do best with a high-intensity warm-up, the sort that Andy Hampsten did; that can allow fast-twitch muscle fibers to contract more efficiently and can prepare the nerve fibers and the cardiovascular system for an all-out effort.

That, at least, is the theory. What’s missing is evidence showing actual effects on performance.

There’s almost nothing credible, as Andrea J. Fradkin an exercise researcher at Bloomsburg University of Pennsylvania, discovered when she searched for published studies on warm-ups. Most of the research was done in the 1960s and ’70s, she told me, and its quality was poor.

In a recent review article she wrote, “Many of the earlier studies were poorly controlled, contained few study participants and often omitted statistical analysis.”

The studies were of so little value, she concluded, that “it is not known whether warming up is of benefit, of potential harm, or having no effect on an individual’s performance.”

An exception is Dr. Fradkin’s own studies of warming up before playing golf. After a decade of research, she found that a seven-and-a-half-minute warm-up involving cardiovascular exercise, stretching and air swings — swinging a golf club without hitting a ball — can significantly improve performance.

But that does not necessarily mean the same routine will work in other sports. As Dr. Fradkin put it, “How can you compare improving performance in golf with improving performance in swimming?”

It’s an appalling situation, she told me. Serious athletes place so much emphasis on warming up, yet what they do is based more on trial and error than on science. For now, she said, what to do “is almost a ‘he said, she said’ thing.”

8202011

2011 CrossFit Games Master Chipper

For time:
10 Handstand push-ups
20 Wall ball shots, 20 pound ball to 10′ target
30 Toes-to-bar
40 Power cleans, 135 pounds
50 Burpees
60 Sumo deadlift high-pull, 75 pounds

Post Times to Whiteboard

Common Sense (Updated 2011 for the Paleo/Primal Diet)

382px-Commonsense

Thomas Paine began work on Common Sense in late 1775 under the working title of Plain Truth.  It was a work that detailed why it was flat out common sense that Ameeica was to be independent and not colonized by the British.  Now it is time for us a humans to realize that we are independent and have choice and option, and do not have to be ruled by a Grain ridden diet that is causing more harm than good.  Now is the time to take a stand against the big money in America and fight the grain industry from shoving poor food pyramids, pates, diagrams, etc. at our kids and giving them poor nutrition information.

Below I have take Paine’s arguments against Briish Rule and loosley, very loosely transformed them into the Paleo/Primal argument against grains.  Hope you see the correlation between our civil independence and our diet/health independence.  It is flat out commons sense, so why do people look at us sideways when we say we eat Paleo/Primal?

Paine’s arguments against British rule

  • It was absurd for an island to rule a continent.
  • America was not a “British nation”; it was composed of influences and peoples from all of Europe.
  • Even if Britain were the “mother country” of America, that made her actions all the more horrendous, for no mother would harm her children so brutally.
  • Being a part of Britain would drag America into unnecessary European wars, and keep it from the international commerce at which America excelled.
  • The distance between the two nations made governing the colonies from England unwieldy. If some wrong were to be petitioned to Parliament, it would take a year before the colonies received a response.
  • The New World was discovered shortly before the Reformation. The Puritans believed that God wanted to give them a safe haven from the persecution of British rule.
  • Britain ruled the colonies for its own benefit, and did not consider the best interests of the colonists in governing them.

Paleo/Primal Eating arguments against Grain’s rule

  • It is absurd for a single food to rule a healthy diet.
  • Our Body is not a “Grain Mill”; it was composed of influences and peoples from all of Europe.
  • Even if Grain were the “mother food” of our body, that makes its  actions all the more horrendous, for no mother would harm her children so brutally.
  • Being a part of Grain would drag our body into unnecessary wars, and keep it from the internal commerce at which our body excels.
  • The distance between the two items makes  governing the body from within unwieldy. If some wrong were to be petitioned to our systems, it would take extended times before the the body received a response.
  • The new plan was discovered recently. The Old School believed that Grain gave them a nourishment.
  • Grain ruled the body against its own benefit, and is not considered the best interests of the body in nourighing it.

Disclosure:  Typical blah, blah and blah here.  I am not a certified anything when it comes to diet, nutrition, grains, etc.  I am simply expressing my point of view and hope it helps or you at least find it entertaining.  Before trying any type of diet you should talk to a professional who has an education in such!

 

-projectRx Out!

Beyond Paleo

Found this article thanks to @MovNat on Twitter and thought it was well worth a repost.

http://oemhuman.com/the-big-picture-beyond-the-paleo-diet/

Healthy Eating Is Too Expensive for Most Americans by Timi Gustafson R.D.

paleo_pyramid

So here is a blog post from my local newspaper that I ran across this morning and at first thought wow this is going to be a fun little piece to read!  Fun is not the way I now want to describe it.  A few thoughts before your read it:

  1. How can people agree with this MyPlate from the government.  It is such a piece of crap.  Again we are trying to provide nutritional guidelines to Americans that was obviously controlled by BIG Money in the farming businesses and thus again are grain heavy in our diets, which is not a good thing!
  2. Why do people justify eating like crap because it is costly to eat healthy?  First, there are always ways to bargain shop.  People can go to a Farmers Market and get amazing deals, but they are to overweight and lazy because of their crappy diets to do so.  And how many of us out there have some item that we could cut out of our daily routine or cut back on to save money and put to a better cause, like, I don’t know, our health?  Stop smoking a pack a day, stop downing 3 rockstars a day, etc. etc.
  3. Last but not least why doesn’t the government pull their heads out of their a$$ and do something about this?  Oh yeah because of all the money the grain farmers give them to not do anything!  Ever heard that discussion about how the government pays farmers to limit supply?  Well lets stop doing that and lets make our citizens healthier and happier!

 

Healthy Eating Is Too Expensive for Most Americans

Posted 8/8/2011 11:33 AM PDT

Most Americans are unable to follow their government’s recommendations for healthy eating, simply because they can’t financially afford to do so, says a study that was recently published in the journal “Health Affairs.”

The updated food pyramid, now called “MyPlate,” encourages higher consumption of fresh fruits and vegetables, which are typically more expensive than processed foods. Purchasing food items that provide important nutrients like potassium, dietary fiber, vitamin D and calcium, could add up to $380 annually to consumers’ grocery bills, according to the lead author of the study, Dr. Pablo Monsivais, professor at the Department of Epidemiology and the School of Public Health at the University of Washington.

Only the people who are able to spend considerable amounts of money on food get close to meeting the federal recommendations, the study found. “Given the times we’re in, the government really needs to make [its] dietary guidelines more relevant to Americans,” Dr. Monsivais said.

His assessment is based on a survey of about 2,000 residents of King County in the State of Washington, which included random telephone calls and printed follow-up questionnaires. Participants were asked to list the grocery items they typically bought, which then were analyzed for nutrient content and estimated costs.

The study results are at odds with the widespread assumption that people make their food choices primarily based on individual tastes and preferences. “Almost 15 percent of households in America say they don’t have enough money to eat the way they want to eat. Estimates show 49 million Americans make food decisions based on cost,” said Dr. Hilary Seligman, professor of medicine at the University of California at San Francisco, who was not involved in the study. “Right now, a huge chunk of America just isn’t able to adhere to these [government] guidelines,” she added.

Dr. Seligman agrees with the study’s conclusion that the government could and should do more to help people who struggle with ever-rising food prices. Government can affect the cost of food in a number of ways. Subsidies are available for big agricultural industries that specialize in corn, soy and sugar production but not for small farms that grow fresh produce. Those policies could be changed if there was enough political courage.

For now, it seems, a lot of people won’t have the luxury to improve their eating habits even if they understand the need to do so. According to a 2010 report published in the journal “Psychological Science,” the cost of fresh produce has almost quadrupled since the 1980s. Prices for processed foods, on the other hand, have hardly changed over the same time period. Sodas are now just 30 percent more expensive than they were 30 years ago.

When it comes to meeting daily calorie requirements, it is much cheaper to make do with lesser nutritional quality. According to a study published in the “Journal of the American Dietetic Association” (2007), consumers can buy 1,000 calories worth of processed foods for less than 10 percent of the price for the same amount of calories from fresh produce. Fruits and vegetables don’t only cost more, they are also less calorie-dense than processed items, which makes it necessary to buy larger quantities, just to meet one’s calorie needs.

So, is it illusory to expect Americans to better their diet because of financial constraints? Some experts have suggested that educating the public not only in terms of healthy eating but also smart shopping is a necessary first step.

Fast food and pizza are often falsely thought of as cheap. While you can get a basic meal at a drive-through for a couple of bucks, the costs can add up quickly when you order the bigger sizes, side-orders and soft drinks. A large pizza can easily set a family back $20 or more. For the same amount, you can buy at least a few potatoes, frozen vegetables and some chicken pieces to prepare at home.

Being a smart shopper can indeed make a difference in your pocket book. Grocery stores always have sales events going on, especially in the produce department where the most perishable items are offered. Look for coupons and specials in local newspapers and online. And you can get better deals at discount stores.

Planning ahead for several days reduces spoilage and waste. Leftovers can be reused for soups and stews. It is also important to understand portion sizes. For instance, a large banana or a whole grapefruit may be more than one serving. A fruit salad can give a healthy boost to a whole family.

There are countless ways to maintain high nutritional standards without breaking the bank. Does that make the issue of healthful eating versus affordability go away? Of course not. But, since these are the times we’re in, we have to start somewhere.

Timi Gustafson R.D. is a clinical dietitian and author of “The Healthy Diner – How to Eat Right and Still Have Fun™,” which is available on her blog http://www.timigustafson.com and at amazon.com. Her latest book, “Kids Love Healthy Foods™” is now available in e-book format, also at www.amazon.com

via SFGate Community Persona page for timigustafsonrd self-publishing at SFGate, news and information for the San Francisco Bay Area..

Q&A with Robb Wolf (Video)

Here is a video Q&A with one of the most recognizable icons of Paleo.  Ask Robb Wolf Anything!

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-PpuIKTg6QE]